Confirmed Divorce Procedure in Pakistan:

 If you need to proceed with the confirmed divorce procedure in Pakistan or Nadra divorce certificate, you may contact Jamila Law Associates. The husband, according to al Hidāya, had the ability to request more than simply the dower as payment. As the dower had not yet been paid by the husband – as the wife had refused to come and live with him – the Supreme Court recommended that the lower courts on divorce procedure in Pakistan or Nadra divorce certificate to evaluate all the gifts that had been given to the wife.

Khula:

If the husband requested the return of everything that he had provided to her thus far, the judge could order it, placing a rather heavy price on the wife to receive her khula.  The resulting decision, penned by Justices S.A. Rahman and S.A. Mahmoud, represented the completion of the judiciary’s expansion of authority and constituted a full rupture from the previous Ḥanafī discourse.

MLFO:

 Now, regardless of what was present in the DMMA, the MFLO, or the previous rulings made by the judiciary, women could be granted a decree of divorce procedure in Pakistan or Nadra divorce certificate by any family court judge without the consent of the husband and without the need to prove any fault or reason other than her strong dislike of her husband and a willingness to give up her dower. Although the position of the court will be presented in detail in Blog Five, it is important here to mention two points where the Supreme Court cemented the understanding of the High Court and departed from the traditional discourse: taqlīd and ijmāʻ. As was mentioned in the ruling, the High Court believed that the concept of following the rulings of only the Ḥanafī School was a modern invention and had never applied to the judiciary in the past.

Nadra Divorce Certificate:

The Supreme Court on divorce procedure in Pakistan or Nadra divorce certificate has now taken up that ruling and confirmed it. The court’s decision stated,  The learned Imams [of the four orthodox schools of Sunni fiqh] never claimed finality for their opinions, but due to various historical causes, their followers in subsequent ages, invented the doctrine of taqlid, under which a Sunni Muslim must follow the opinions of only one of their Imams, exclusively, irrespective of whether the reason is in favor, of another opinion.

No Warranty:

There is no warranty for this doctrinaire fossilization in the Quran or authentic Ahadith.  The very founder of the Ḥanafī School, Abū Ḥanīfa, himself believed that his opinions were not to be understood as final. Citing the common century encyclopedia of Muslim sects, al-Milal wa al-Niḥal by Abū ’l-Fatḥ al-Shahrastānī, Abū Ḥanīfa reportedly stated, “this is my opinion, and I consider it to be the best for divorce procedure in Pakistan or Nadra divorce certificate. If someone regards another person’s opinion to be better, he is welcome to it (for him is his opinion and for us ours).” The translated quote provided by the court, however, did not capture the full meaning of the Arabic wording.